Female Representation in Pediatric Ophthalmology at the American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting From 2018 to 2022.

PURPOSE: To identify trends in female pediatric ophthalmologist authorship and representation at the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) Annual Meeting from 2018 to 2022. METHODS: Participant data from 2018 to 2022 were collected from the AAO website, organized by conference activity (papers, posters, instruction courses, videos, symposia, subspecialty day, and awards), and analyzed by sex using an online tool. Chi-squared and odds ratio analyses were performed to determine trends in authorship sex and associations between the sex of paper and poster authors in each category. RESULTS: Of 923 pediatric ophthalmology presentations from 2018 to 2022, 46.2% (426 of 923) of presenters and 46.6% (281 of 603) of unique individual participants were women. Overall, 48% (174 of 362) of first and senior authors of papers and posters were women. No significant difference or association between female first and female senior authors was observed (52% vs 44%, P = .14; odds ratio 1.59, P = .13). There was no significant change in the proportion of total female presenters from 2018 to 2019 (-3.09%, P = .53), 2019 to 2020 (0.76%, P = .88), 2020 to 2021 (9.09%, P = .09), 2021 to 2022 (-5.68%, P = .30), or 2018 to 2022 (1.08%, P = .84). CONCLUSIONS: Since 2018, female representation at the AAO Annual Meeting has remained consistent and nears 50%. The lack of a significant difference between the proportion of female first and senior authors suggests that junior female pediatric ophthalmologists are climbing the ranks and more broadly engaging in mentorship roles. Considering the increasing proportion of female pediatric ophthalmologists, the absence of corollary, statistically significant increases in female participation may be of concern. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 20XX;X(X):XX-XX.].

Association between community-level political affiliation and peripartum vaccination.

BACKGROUND: Political affiliation has been associated with vaccine uptake, but whether this association holds in pregnancy, when individuals are recommended to receive multiple vaccinations, remains to be studied. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the association between community-level political affiliation and vaccinations for tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis; influenza; and COVID-19 in pregnant and postpartum individuals. STUDY DESIGN: A survey was conducted about tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis and influenza vaccinations in early 2021, with a follow-up survey of COVID-19 vaccination among the same individuals at a tertiary care academic medical center in the Midwest. Geocoded residential addresses were linked at the census tract to the Environmental Systems Research Institute 2021 Market Potential Index, which ranks a community in comparison to the US national average. The exposure for this analysis was community-level political affiliation, defined by the Market Potential Index as very conservative, somewhat conservative, centrist, somewhat liberal, and very liberal (reference). The outcomes were self-reported vaccinations for tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis; influenza; and COVID-19 in the peripartum period. Modified Poisson regression was used and adjusted for age, employment, trimester at assessment, and medical comorbidities. RESULTS: Of 438 assessed individuals, 37% lived in a community characterized by very liberal political affiliation, 11% as somewhat liberal, 18% as centrist, 12% as somewhat conservative, and 21% as very conservative. Overall, 72% and 58% of individuals reported receiving tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis and influenza vaccinations, respectively. Of the 279 individuals who responded to the follow-up survey, 53% reported receiving COVID-19 vaccination. Individuals living in a community characterized by very conservative political affiliation were less likely to report vaccinations for tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (64% vs 72%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.99); influenza (49% vs 58%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-1.00); and COVID-19 (35% vs 53%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.96) than those in a community characterized by very liberal political affiliation. Individuals living in a community characterized by centrist political affiliation were less likely to report vaccinations for tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (63% vs 72%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.99) and influenza (44% vs 58%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.92) than those in a community characterized by very liberal political affiliation. CONCLUSION: Compared with pregnant and postpartum individuals living in communities characterized by very liberal political beliefs, those living in communities characterized by very conservative political beliefs were less likely to report vaccinations for tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis; influenza; and COVID-19, and those in communities characterized by centrist political beliefs were less likely to report vaccinations for tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis and influenza. Increasing vaccine uptake in the peripartum period may need to consider engaging an individual's broader sociopolitical milieu.

Is there a "price that's right" for at-home COVID tests?

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the daily lives of individuals across the world as multiple variants continue introducing new complexities. In December 2021, which is when we conducted our study, pressure to resume the normalcy of daily life was mounting as a new variant, Omicron, was rapidly spreading. A variety of at-home tests detecting SARS-CoV-2, known to the general public as "COVID tests," were available for consumers to purchase. In this study, we conducted conjoint analysis utilizing an internet-based survey by presenting consumers (n = 583) with 12 different hypothetical at-home COVID test concepts that varied on five attributes (price, accuracy, time, where-to-buy, and method). Price was identified as the most important attribute, because participants were very price sensitive. Quick turnaround time and high accuracy were also identified as important. Additionally, although 64% of respondents were willing to take an at-home COVID test, only 22% reported they had previously taken the test. On December 21, 2021, President Biden announced the U.S. government would purchase 500 million at-home rapid tests and distribute them for free to Americans. Given the importance of price to participants, this policy of providing free at-home COVID tests was directionally appropriate.

Protecting Breastfeeding during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has impacted all patient populations including pregnant mothers. There is an incomplete understanding of SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and transmission potential at this time and the resultant anxiety has led to variable breastfeeding recommendations for suspected or confirmed mothers with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to the potential concern for transmission of infection from maternal respiratory secretions to the newborn, temporary separation of the maternal-baby dyad, allowing for expressed breast milk to be fed to the infant, was initially recommended but later revised to include breastfeeding by the American Academy of Pediatrics in contrast to international societies, which recommend direct breastfeeding. This separation can have negative health and emotional implications for both mother and baby. Only two publications have reported SARS-CoV-2 in human breast milk but the role of breast milk as a vehicle of transmission of COVID-19 to the newborns still remains unclear and may indeed be providing protective antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 infection even in infected neonates. Other modes of transmission of infection to neonates from infected mothers or any care providers cannot be overemphasized. Symptomatic mothers on hydroxychloroquine can safely breastfeed and no adverse effects were reported in a baby treated with remdesivir in another drug trial. The excretion of sarilumab in human breast milk is unknown at this time. Hence, given the overall safety of breast milk and both short-term and long- term nutritional, immunological, and developmental advantages of breast milk to newborn, breast milk should not be withheld from baby. The setting of maternal care, severity of maternal infection and availability of resources can impact the decision of breastfeeding, the role of shared decision making on breastfeeding between mother and physician needs to be emphasized. We strongly recommend direct breastfeeding with appropriate hygiene precautions unless the maternal or neonatal health condition warrants separation of this dyad. KEY POINTS: · Breastmilk does not appear to play a significant role in transmission of SARS-CoV-2.. · Mother-baby separation has negative health and emotional consequences.. · Mothers with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 can directly breastfeed with appropriate precautions..

Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Long-Distance Travel Business: How Far Can We Go?

Long-distance (LD) travel accounts for over 30% of person-trip miles, with important energy and emissions impact. LD business travel can often be replaced by remote participation, so targeting such trips for cost, time, and emissions savings may be a wise strategy for protection of the climate, budgets, and human health. To appreciate Americans? LD travel choices better, a 73-question online survey was conducted in 2019 that captured 2,327 LD (over 100?mi each way) trips made by 929 respondents during the previous 12 months, of which 490 round trips were for business purposes. Predictive models for LD trips per adult per year, overnights, LD travel times, and willingness to participate remotely and/or purchase carbon offsets for those trips were developed using respondents in Austin only. As expected, those educated to degree level tend to travel more often, for both business and nonbusiness purposes, everything else is constant. People who undertake LD travel more frequently are more likely to spend less time in transit/en route. Single people or those from large households educated to degree level are more likely to be willing to pay for the carbon emissions produced by their flights. Out of the 298 LD business trips made by Austinites, remote participation is possible for approximately a quarter, and the respondents involved are willing to participate remotely in 44% of those trips. In other words, Austinites appeared willing to participate remotely in slightly over 10% of their business trips overall, at least before the COVID-19 pandemic. This is definitely not enough to address climate change concerns as a result of carbon emissions from LD travel.

The Impact of Financial Incentives on Attendance and Motivation for Bariatric Support Groups

Background: Attending bariatric support groups is associated with higher weight loss post-bariatric surgery;however, attendance can be low due to several important barriers (e.g., time, motivation, distance). Incentivizing participation in desired behaviors is one strategy that has been used widely in many areas (e.g., health behaviors, work performance) but has not been used specifically to increase attendance to bariatric support groups. Methods: A single-center, prospective, pilot study was performed from January 1, 2020 - March 1, 2020 (timeline shortened drastically due to COVID-19 pandemic). Participants who were > 1-year postoperative were eligible to receive a monetary incentive ($20 per support group meeting) for attending bariatric surgery support groups. They also were asked to complete the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) to assess motivation at each support group they attended. Results: Attendance pre-incentive (2019) to post-incentive (2020) increased significantly (RR = 9.1, 95% CI: 4.8-19.2, p < .0001). Results from the TSRQ at baseline suggested higher intrinsic motivation (m = 4.75, sd = 1.09) than extrinsic motivation (m= 1.55, sd = 0.91), and there was no change in motivation level over time (p's > .05). Conclusions: This pilot study suggests the potential benefit of providing incentives to increase attendance to bariatric surgery support groups. It also suggests that motivation for many people participating in this study was intrinsic despite the provision of an extrinsic reward for attendance. Future research over a longer period may clarify what level and type of incentives provide the most benefit and how this impacts motivation over time.

Association between social vulnerability and COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and vaccination in pregnant and postpartum individuals.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association of community-level social vulnerability with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and vaccination among pregnant and postpartum individuals. METHODS: Prospective cohort study assessing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among pregnant and postpartum individuals. We performed a baseline survey on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy from 03/22/21 to 04/02/21, and a follow-up survey on COVD-19 vaccination status 3- to 6-months later. The primary exposure was the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention SVI (Social Vulnerability Index), measured in quartiles. Higher SVI quartiles indicated greater community-level social vulnerability with the lowest quartile (quartile 1) as the referent group. The primary outcome was COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy on the baseline survey (uncertainty or refusal of the vaccine), and the secondary outcome was self-report of not being vaccinated (unvaccinated) for COVID-19 on the follow-up survey. RESULTS: Of 456 assessed individuals, 46% reported COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy on the baseline survey; and of 290 individuals (290/456, 64%) who completed the follow-up survey, 48% (140/290) were unvaccinated. The frequency of baseline vaccine hesitancy ranged from 25% in quartile 1 (low SVI) to 68% in quartile 4 (high SVI), and being unvaccinated at follow-up ranged from 29% in quartile 1 to 77% in quartile 4. As social vulnerability increased, the risk of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy at baseline increased (quartile 2 aRR (adjusted relative risk): 1.46; 95% CI:0.98 to 2.19; quartile 3 aRR: 1.86; 95% CI:1.28 to 2.71; and quartile 4 aRR: 2.24; 95% CI:1.56 to 3.21), as did the risk of being unvaccinated at follow-up (quartile 2 aRR: 1.00; 95% CI:0.66 to 1.51; quartile 3 aRR: 1.68; 95% CI:1.17 to 2.41; and quartile 4 aRR: 1.82; 95% CI:1.30 to 2.56). CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant and postpartum individuals living in an area with higher community-level social vulnerability were more likely to report COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and subsequently to be unvaccinated at follow-up.

Liver function test pattern as a means for predicting Covid-19 pneumonia related severity

Objectives: After being declared a pandemic, SARS CoV-2 causing Covid-19 pneumonia has been rampant in affecting the world population and causing heightened morbidity & mortality across all age groups. SARS CoV-2 was found to affect many organs systems of the human body, from lungs to brain, kidneys, coagulation system & also involving gastrointestinal system & liver respectively. It exerts effects on the liver via complex incompletely understood processes including, directly utilizing ACE-II receptors & mitochondrial protein complexes and indirectly via exaggerating the immune response via cytokine storm and drug effects, to include a few. We have conducted our research to see the prevalence of liver function (LFT). derangement, its pattern of derangement, and the association of LFT pattern to the severity of. Covid-19 pneumonia. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, consecutive data analysis was conducted at Dow University hospital & OICD. All patients above 18 years of age with positive rRT-PCR on the nasal swab for Covid-19, admitted at our institute were enrolled after excluding patients with previous liver disease. Patients' demographic, co-morbidities, addictions, laboratory, and baseline data were collected from electronic & paper records. The severity of Covid-19 was defined by WHO protocols. Results: Mixed and cholestatic pattern of liver function derangement is prevalent in patients with Covid-19 pneumonia, whereas mixed pattern derangement of LFT is associated with the development of Severe Covid-19 pneumonia along with higher age of patient population and presence of hypertension are risk factors for developing severe covid-9 pneumonia. However, individually deranged AST is statistically associated with the development of severe covid-19. pneumonia. Conclusion: Liver function derangement seems to be an integral part of widespread abnormalities occurring in Covid-19 pneumonia affected patients, which ought to be overlooked. Moreover, mixed pattern derangement with raised AST levels may aid in identifying patients needing watchful monitoring till the disease subsides.

Changes in Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Opioid-Related Outcomes in Urban Areas during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Rapid Review of the Literature.

Opioid use disorders (OUDs) are increasingly common among minoritized populations, who have historically experienced limited access to healthcare, a situation that may have worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a structured keyword search in Pubmed, we reviewed the literature to synthesize the evidence on changes in racial/ethnic disparities in OUD-related outcomes in urban areas during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. Nine articles were included in the final analysis. Six found increases in OUD-related outcomes during the pandemic, with four showing a widening of disparities. Results also point to the worsening of opioid outcomes among Black and Latinx individuals related to shelter-in-place or stay-at-home orders. Studies examining the use of telehealth and access to OUD treatment showed that minoritized groups have benefited from telehealth programs. The limited number of studies in a small number of jurisdictions indicate a gap in research examining the intersection between COVID-19 and OUD-related outcomes with a focus on disparities. More research is needed to understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related policies on OUD outcomes among racial/ethnic minoritized groups, including examining the impact of service disruptions on vulnerable groups with OUD.

Decreased severity of COVID-19 in vaccinated pregnant individuals during predominance of different SARS-CoV-2 variants.

PROBLEM: Since the start of the pandemic, Pregnant individuals have been disproportionately affected by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Vaccination has been shown to be protective against severe disease. However, data on effectiveness of vaccine in reducing disease severity are limited in pregnant individuals who later developed COVID-19. METHOD OF STUDY: This is a single academic center retrospective cohort study of pregnant individuals who tested positive for COVID-19 from December 2020 through January 2022. The cohort was divided into two groups based on vaccination status. The primary outcome of our study was progression to severe or critical disease. A secondary analysis was performed based on the timeframes of predominance of different variants of SARS-CoV-2, to determine whether the effect of vaccination was different during these epochs. RESULTS: Our cohort included 472 patients among which 125 (26.5%) were vaccinated and 347 were unvaccinated. None of the patients in the vaccinated group who later developed COVID-19 progressed to severe or critical disease compared to 7.2% in the unvaccinated one (p < .01). Similarly, after adjusting for medical comorbidities, obesity, receipt of monoclonal antibodies, and trimester at diagnosis, vaccinated individuals who later developed COVID-19 were less likely to be admitted to the hospital (1.6% vs. 14.7%, aOR .14, 95% CI .22-.47) compared with unvaccinated ones. CONCLUSION: Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in pregnant individuals who later develop a breakthrough infection, is associated with decreased progression to severe or critical COVID-19, and need for hospital and ICU admissions. Vaccination is specifically effective during the predominance of the more severe Delta variant.

Outpatient Use of Monoclonal Antibodies in Pregnant Individuals With Mild or Moderate Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Treatment with monoclonal antibodies has been shown to significantly reduce the risk of hospitalization and disease progression among high-risk patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Pregnant individuals were excluded from the original trials. In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we evaluated whether monoclonal antibody treatment in pregnant individuals is associated with decreased risk of hospitalization. Outcomes of patients who received the treatment were compared with those who were eligible but did not receive the treatment. Analyses were stratified by vaccination status. Unvaccinated pregnant patients with mild or moderate COVID-19 who received outpatient monoclonal antibodies were less likely to be admitted to the hospital (4.2% vs 15.7%, odds ratio 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.74), whereas among vaccinated patients, the treatment was not associated with a lower rate of hospitalization (2.3% vs 0%, P=.99).

Association of initial COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy with subsequent vaccination among pregnant and postpartum individuals.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between initial COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and subsequent vaccination among pregnant and postpartum individuals. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: A Midwestern tertiary-care academic medical center. Individuals completed a baseline vaccine hesitancy assessment from 22 March 2021 to 2 April 2021, with subsequent ascertainment of vaccination status at 3-6 months follow-up. METHODS: We used multivariable Poisson regression to estimate the relative risk of vaccination by baseline vaccine hesitancy status, and then characteristics associated with vaccination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-report of COVID-19 vaccination, and secondarily, consideration of COVID-19 vaccination among those not vaccinated. RESULTS: Of 456 individuals (93% pregnant, 7% postpartum) initially surveyed, 290 individuals (64%; 23% pregnant, 77% postpartum) provided subsequent vaccination status (median = 17 weeks). Of these 290 individuals, 40% (116/290) reported COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy upon enrolment, of whom 52% reported subsequent vaccination at follow-up. Few individuals transitioned during the study period from vaccine hesitant to vaccinated (10%); in comparison, 80% of those who were not vaccine hesitant were vaccinated at follow-up (aRR 0.19, 95% CI 0.11-0.33). Among those who remained unvaccinated at follow-up, 38% who were vaccine hesitant at baseline were considering vaccination, compared with 71% who were not vaccine hesitant (aRR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33-0.67). Individuals who were older, parous, employed and of higher educational attainment were more likely to be vaccinated, and those who identified as non-Hispanic black, were Medicaid beneficiaries, and were still pregnant at follow-up were less likely to be vaccinated. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy persisted over time in the peripartum period, and few individuals who reported hesitancy at baseline were later vaccinated. Interventions that address vaccine hesitancy in pregnancy are needed.

Public perceptions during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada: a demographic analysis of self-reported beliefs, behaviors, and information acquisition.

INTRODUCTION: We explored associations between sociodemographic factors and public beliefs, behaviors, and information acquisition related to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to identify how the experiences of subpopulations in Canada may vary. METHODS: We administered a national online survey through Ipsos Incorporated to adults residing in Canada. Sampling was stratified by population age, sex, and regional distributions. We used descriptive statistics to summarize responses and test for differences based on gender, age, educational attainment, and household income using chi-squared tests, followed by weighted logistic regression. RESULTS: We collected 1996 eligible questionnaires between April 26th and May 1st, 2020. Respondents mean age was 50 years, 51% were women, 56% had a post-secondary degree, and 72% had a household income <$100,000. Our analysis found differences within the four demographic groups, with age effects most acutely evidenced. Respondents 65 years and older were more likely to perceive the pandemic as very serious, less likely to report declines in overall health, and more likely to intend to get vaccinated, compared to 18-29 year olds. Women overall were more likely to report negative outcomes than men, including stress due to the pandemic, and worsening social, mental/emotional, and spiritual health. Respondents 45 and older were more likely to seek and trust information from traditional Canadian news sources, while 18-29 year olds were more likely to seek and trust information on social media; overall, women and respondents with a post-secondary degree were more likely to access and trust online information from public health sites. CONCLUSION: This study found important demographic differences in how adults living in Canada perceived the COVID-19 pandemic, the impacts on their health, and their preferences for information acquisition. Our results highlight the need to consider demographic characteristics in tailoring the format and information medium to improve large scale acceptance and uptake of mitigation and containment measures.